01
Two-minute brief
Tell us about your business and pick this service. The listed price anchors every quote: no bait, no mystery ranges.
Concept previews illustrating this service's typical deliverables.
What this is
The service, straight up.
General research tools are general on purpose, and that is exactly what makes them useless for this. A tool that knows a little about everything cannot tell you that a particular regulator publishing a particular discussion paper is the most important thing that happened in your sector this month. That judgement requires knowing the sector: which twelve sources actually matter, which forty companies are worth tracking, which words mean something specific here, and which announcements are genuinely significant rather than merely loud.
So this agent is built for one industry and configured with yours. Sources are chosen deliberately during scoping: the trade press, the regulator, the standards body, the association, tender portals, ASX announcements, the competitors' own newsrooms, the relevant subreddits and LinkedIn voices if they matter in your sector. A watchlist tracks the companies, people, technologies and topics you care about. Every run pulls what is new, discards what is noise, groups what is related, and writes a briefing that opens with why each item matters to you specifically rather than restating a headline.
Every claim carries a citation back to the source. That is not a nicety, it is the entire basis for trusting the thing. The briefing is short by design, because a digest nobody finishes is a digest nobody reads, and it is ruthless about the difference between "a competitor changed their pricing page" and "a competitor put out a press release". Items are ranked, related items are merged, and a quiet week produces a short briefing rather than padding.
Then there is the command interface, which is where it stops being a newsletter. Ask it in plain English: what has changed in the tender pipeline this quarter, summarise everything on this competitor since March, who is hiring for roles that suggest they are building what we build, pull the last two years of a regulator's publications and tell me the direction of travel. It runs the research and answers with sources attached. You can promote any answer into a standing question that runs on a schedule and alerts you when it changes, which is how a one-off question quietly becomes permanent coverage.
What's included
- Source selection scoped to your specific industry, not a generic feed
- Watchlist for companies, people, technologies and topics
- Scheduled briefings by email, Slack or Teams
- Every claim cited back to its source and date
- Ranking and grouping, so a quiet week is a short briefing
- Plain-English command interface for ad hoc research
- Standing questions that re-run and alert on change
- Full searchable archive of everything it has ever collected
How it works
Fixed price, not fixed blind.
02
Three of the 13
Within 24 hours, three of the 13 vetted developers who deliver this service send written, fixed-scope quotes. Compare and choose.
03
Build, guaranteed
Typical delivery in 4–6 weeks. If a matched developer drops the ball, we step in. Service Guarantee, always.
FAQ
Fair questions.
Use them too, they are good. The difference is standing coverage of a defined sector. A general tool answers the question you thought to ask, on the day you thought to ask it, from whatever it happens to find. This watches a curated source list continuously, knows which forty companies matter to you, and tells you about the thing you did not know to ask about. It is the difference between a search engine and having someone on the desk whose job is your industry.
Structurally, rather than by hoping. It only summarises documents it has actually retrieved, every claim is cited to a source and date you can click, and it is built to say a source was unavailable rather than fill the gap. It is a retrieval system with a writing layer on top, not a model asked to recall things from memory. If you cannot click through to the original, that is a bug and we treat it as one.
Anything with a feed, an API or a public page that the terms allow: trade publications, regulators, standards bodies, associations, government registers, tender portals, ASX announcements, competitor sites and newsrooms, job boards, and social where it genuinely matters in your sector. Paywalled trade press can usually be included if you hold a licence, and we will tell you which of your proposed sources are off limits during scoping.
Your choice: daily before you start, weekly on a Monday, or an alert the moment something on your watchlist moves. Delivery by email, Slack or Teams, with the full archive searchable in the web interface. Most teams settle on a weekly briefing plus immediate alerts on a short list of things they cannot afford to hear about late.
You change it yourself. Sources, watchlists, topics and schedules are all editable in the interface without a developer, because a research agent frozen on its launch-day configuration is worth very little a year later. The standing questions work the same way: write one, keep it as long as it earns its place, delete it when it stops.
Related services
